I think Mikrotik have been having an identity crisis, and have lost focus on what made them successful in the first place. I do not think that Cisco and Juniper are too strong for Mikrotik. Customer's expectations and requirements are simply to diverse Just my opinion, but a "jack of all trades" software as ROS currently is, will not work out in the long-run. Instead of working on "stupid" wifi-fixes in every release (just check the ROS changelogs), the CCOS development team could then focus on implementing enterprise/core-networking features such as multi-core BGP, ECMP, BGP4 SNMP MIBs, VXLAN, etc. Two separate development teams could then work on ROS and CloudCoreOS independently and thus more effectively. Seriously, NO ONE needs that SOHO/WISP functionality for a BGP core-router or core-switch. CloudCoreOS) without all that unnecessary stuff like wifi, hotspot, parental control and so on. Maybe it would be an idea to fork current ROS to a new, dedicated and cleaned-up version for the CCR/CRS platform (eg.
While MTs hardware design is very nice and ROS is a damn feature-rich router operating system, it still lacks so many urgently required features to be used in production core-networking. Maybe the competition among the industry leaders like Cisco and Juniper is just too strong for MT in that segment - who knows? Ĭoncerning the CCR/CRS'es, while being very ambitious at the beginning, to me it seems Mikrotik has lost it's interest in getting into the core-routing and -switching market.
I will invite u to drink it with me i can't believe for what i need 36 cores on tile.
0 kommentar(er)
